Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Link up A&A Pacific 1940 and Europe 1940, and you've got Axis & Allies Global 1940.
User avatar
Gargantua
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:08 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by Gargantua » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:24 pm

have planes on islands with an airbase be able to block movement

I like this concept.

But it might have some SERIOUS implications in Europe...

User avatar
Gargantua
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:08 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by Gargantua » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:28 pm

Hmm... thinking about it,

The only way to do this - would be to bring back the old CAP rules, so you make it clear your aircraft are going to stop anything going into that zone - otherwise, everyone's navy is going to get chop blocked by units that aren't there, because most people aren't going to scramble if their planes are just going to die.

Better, if this is what you want, make a "minefield" installation piece like any airbase or naval base piece - that blocks and interdicts movement through that zone. Could apply on the land too, and perhaps acts like an AAG would against ships or infantry units, when defending the territory.

conroy
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:17 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by conroy » Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:28 pm

If you stick to the original oob def for island (a territory completely surrounded by one seazone) it wouldn't really have many implications in Europe except Malta, which would be fantastic in my opinion. (and maybe iceland???)

mantlefan
Posts: 612
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:33 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by mantlefan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:37 am

conroy wrote:If you stick to the original oob def for island (a territory completely surrounded by one seazone) it wouldn't really have many implications in Europe except Malta, which would be fantastic in my opinion. (and maybe iceland???)
I think that is still the rules for islands, so you've got a good point. It really doesn't help the one-turn-move-to-Japan issue at all though.
“A lie never lives to be old.” — Sophocles

conroy
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:17 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by conroy » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:01 pm

Well it makes midway one of the most important zero ips territories in the pacific. It makes island hopping even more strategically important aside from the NO. If japan takes it and puts planes on it would block a one turn move to japan.

mantlefan
Posts: 612
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:33 pm

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by mantlefan » Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:55 pm

conroy wrote:Well it makes midway one of the most important zero ips territories in the pacific. It makes island hopping even more strategically important aside from the NO. If japan takes it and puts planes on it would block a one turn move to japan.
Unless Japan moves their whole navy to Midway there's really no point in taking it. If they send 1 transport it's an easy US counter, and if they send a bunch they are wasting transports. Unless USA is really terrible they would be able to counter a Japanese move to Midway, and what's more if Japan can actually move safely to Midway, USA would have had 0 chance to move to Japan anyways.

The location of Midway helps the US a lot more than it helps Japan.
“A lie never lives to be old.” — Sophocles

Carico67
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:08 pm
Contact:

Modified Set-Up

Post by Carico67 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:34 pm

Well having tested a game where we added 4 Inf to UK, removed a ITA Tran (mistake), upped USA NO for WUSA/CUSA/EUSA by 10 and moved UK Fleet from SZ 98 to 71 we found it looks like it will play better for rated play.

Testing it with 3rd tran back on and 1 ITA inf in TOB.... Sea Lion % were dropped to just below 40 with this step, and at great counter-cost. This likely deviates the game some from continual UK Inf/Inf/Inf builds. JAP really has to have initiatiave reasons to hit the allies with USA powered up and drooling to get to either EUR or the PAC. Games won;t go on forever with USA ramped up some; a needed component for online tournament play. More results fromn the 2nd run as we find it....

Fleet being in SAF gives UK some choices directionally....
Carico67, Vice Chairman Axis and Allies Members Club (www.aamc.net)
email me for help or questions about PBEM; Carico67@hotmail.com

Carico67
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Theory Crafting For Alpha.+3

Post by Carico67 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:36 pm

BTW;
LOVE some of the ideas to promote more island hopping and the value of such. Well thought out guys... wonder if anything will come of it.
Carico67, Vice Chairman Axis and Allies Members Club (www.aamc.net)
email me for help or questions about PBEM; Carico67@hotmail.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests