Alpha+.2

Link up A&A Pacific 1940 and Europe 1940, and you've got Axis & Allies Global 1940.
m7574
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by m7574 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:46 am

I use SFE to describe the region of the soviet far east. There is no such territory in G40. But I figured most people would know what part of the map I was referring to.

thanks for the info Chris. Wasp and I play FTF, but if I want a PBEM game its nice to know there is a server. I'm trying out a game by forum on A&A.org and it works but is messy. Wasp is trying to get me to go to GenCon but I always have a big meathead softball tournament that weekend. If those guys knew of my double life...... :oops:

Carico67
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by Carico67 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:22 am

Larry, just a note as I think it's relevant to maturization of the Alpha series and what I think might be your intended goals:
We're about to test a modified game as follows w/reasons noted:
4 More inf in UK
Remove 1 ITA tran from SZ 97
FRA turn goes AFTER ANZAC from game beginning to minimize turn transition times
SZ 98 goes to SZ 71
USA NO upgrades----Make it +25 if USA owns all of EUSA/CUSA/WUSA
**I am very worried about very long games in rated play....**
Summary:
The above should strengthen ITA overall and UK vs Sea Lion
The French fleet would likely move to SZ 87 to meet up with SAF fleet if UK player chose to swing things West instead of East helping vs a GER navy which has been made overly powerful with the addition of airbases covering SZ 112 wich tactically is the best SZ on the map along with GIB and the CAR Islands...
Axis gains in power from above changes because of possible middle east NO's opening and ITA in better position to be more aggressive
Allies gain in power when USA enters the war, as it should be, forcing the issue on things...

Anyways, just noting as I REALLY want global to take off and will do whatever possible to fundraise and get the DB off the ground at AAMC, but I need to know it will withstand the test of time ruleset wise; and the above are current concerns based from results of testing. Chris C
Carico67, Vice Chairman Axis and Allies Members Club (www.aamc.net)
email me for help or questions about PBEM; Carico67@hotmail.com

Carico67
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by Carico67 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:39 pm

Larry, want to note it here as well (I have it also listed in a test game thread, but expect you likely aren;t eying that) as I think it could be a bigger part of the game for sure, and add to it:
I should note, as it will make Larry happy, that the GER Bombed the naval base in EGY as it looks like the axis won;t be able to get there. I see a BIG problem with the system though***

Airbases and Naval bases SHOULD NOT be functional when damaged. Otherwise the only reawrd is a possible 4 IPC's as things cap at 6, and you only need to pay to get back to 2 damage for it to be useful. This is a BIG deterrant to the system, which could otherwise come into play more IMO.
Just a note from testing. If interested in other findings with an altered start set-up thread is here: http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/ ... =40&t=4452
Carico67, Vice Chairman Axis and Allies Members Club (www.aamc.net)
email me for help or questions about PBEM; Carico67@hotmail.com

m7574
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by m7574 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:50 pm

I agree. I've yet to bomb an air/naval base yet because it is pointless.

oztea
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by oztea » Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:38 pm

ive bombed the port at gibraltar extensively, ive also bombed other ports and airbases with Tactical Bombers just to use my tacs as fodder in the air battle, If i want bombers to get through, its a good way to keep the aircover down. And its still damage....they will want to pay it off eventualy

WILD BILL
Posts: 1487
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:24 pm

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by WILD BILL » Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:12 pm

I agree w/oztea. I find sending tac's up bombing an AB/NB in addition to your primary target so your sbmrs can get through works (still cost then ipc's, if they want to use it). At least in the right circumstances you can SBR an AB to shut down scramble for your allies to take advantage.

I'm torn about not being able to stop the +1 movement effectively (they can fix and use right away). Maybe any damage to a base should shut it down for +1 movement. They have to pay to get it fully operational to get +1 movement (still get benefit, but it could cost more). Keep the 3 damage just for scramble (call it partially operational) Yeah I know more exception etc...


How about that if a base is damaged when your turn starts, it can only support +1 movement for 3 units in combat no restrictions in NCM. (that might be kinda lame too on second thought)

I would also love to see a max of 3 ships can be repaired at any given NB too. In some games I'm seeing we get some huge naval build ups next to NB, because you know as the def that when your turn rolls around you can auto repair your 3BB & 4 CV's at that one port if they survive. As the attacker you know that if your ships survive and you (or your ally) capture that NB you might be ok (on your next turn). I think that would keep NB more on par w/AB too with some kind of limit, they both provide an extra service.

Carico67
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by Carico67 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:44 pm

OK, I'm seeing "I do it's" so I need to cvheck, as I just looked at page 1 rules--- A-Bases and Naval Bases all fire their own AA's at bombers correct? Same with IC's? If so (without looking at the other two rulebooks) I can't see how it pays off in the slightest risk/reward wise with the current fix system as it exists. The idea of penalties for starting with an injured, or forcing full fix for operational abilities, would give SBR life again IMO, and in a tactically useful way.
Carico67, Vice Chairman Axis and Allies Members Club (www.aamc.net)
email me for help or questions about PBEM; Carico67@hotmail.com

oztea
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA

Re: Alpha+.2

Post by oztea » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:25 pm

Bombing Gibraltar as Germany OR Italy now shuts down Gibraltar on the US turn, eliminating their ability to get deep into the Med with transports, or up to W/Germany, Denmark, or Norway.

There arent very many other times to bomb a facility, Egypt has been bombed once or twice just as an economy sink for UK. As well as everything is India. A solid SBR campaign against India, combined with a sub or tow, can shut that economy down utterly.

I rarely see the allies bomb ports and airbases though. Actualy, almost never. And I think the reason is they want to get their hands on them intact so they can use them, another reason is there is really no tactical reason to.

The allies simply use these bases more, to more of an effect. So at least the axis doing it has some negligable use.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests