I'm with Eagle's first view, it's time for the UK to go Global - no more UK India. When Larry split the economies he wasn't counting on the Pacific VCs you have now. If the UK ignores the Pacific then Japan doesn't wait until J3, it goes for its VCs straight away and Germany plays defence. All you have to do is limit the reaction time of India: put a minor there and another in Malaya and if they don't pump out units every turn Japan gets green light to attack (effectively what happens in the UK and Sea Lion).WILD BILL wrote:I don't think the UK econ was split because of capture capital rules. If UK had its entire economy to spend in London the first few rounds Sea lion wouldn't be possible anyway. I think it was more so that UK couldn't use its entire income to rebuild its navy quicker and kill Germany. It would play into a KGF/KIF strat if UK was able to completely abandon India and the Pac side of the board (especially if Japan is waiting for J3 to attack). As it is now UK gets beat up and is forced to play mostly def until the US gets involved (except maybe in the Med). If UK was able to rebound quicker (more income) then while Germany is trying to finish off Russia, they would be in jeopardy of loosing Berlin IMO.
It's true that then the UK wouldn't be able to ward off Sea Lion completely, and it would become a problem if London is taken and its whole economy is paralized. The solution is, as Eagle also said, changing the capital rules:
- gets sacked as it is now
- after it, if a power doesn't have ICs it goes guerilla and can only buy inf and place it in any territory - China, France - plus other units with NOs (Burma road).
- if it has ICs it can produce as normal.
The only problem is that cutting India production and giving a Malaya IC would weaken the balance you have now in the Pacific. Adjustments would have to be made, probably beefing up China. But this will never happen anyway, it's too radical a change for Larry to consider...