The Rules:

We've talked about Advanced A&A... Now I'd like to hear your comments on what YOU envision a DELUXE A&A GAME to be. What would it look like.
Larry
Posts: 3090
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:44 am

Post by Larry » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:08 am

comments noted

Guerrilla Guy
Posts: 402
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:16 pm
Location: Texas Baby!

Post by Guerrilla Guy » Sun May 06, 2007 11:11 am

Long time no see...

Personally I think a substantial change is for call when it comes to production. Factories as they stand are either too easy to utilize, or too morphed for multiple production purposes. I'm not into the "Air, Sea, Land" camp, but I definitely think that "Industrialized" Territories can be utilized in a "minimal" role, to actually make the game flow easier, mainly when it comes to producing Infantry and Artillery.

GG
"We're airborne. We’re supposed to be surrounded."

Dick Winters to 2nd Lt. George Rice after being told that the 101st Airborne would be surrounded at Bastogne

Games are like my Avatar...

Larry
Posts: 3090
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:44 am

Post by Larry » Mon May 07, 2007 8:47 am

Thanks for you comments GG

TMTM
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 4:28 pm
Location: Alpharetta, GA

Post by TMTM » Mon May 07, 2007 9:18 am

How about an IPC progression after each round for the US to simulate america's building up of her industrial capabilites was the war progressed.

FleetAdmiral
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by FleetAdmiral » Tue May 08, 2007 7:29 pm

TMTM wrote:How about an IPC progression after each round for the US to simulate america's building up of her industrial capabilites was the war progressed.
Would this be unlimited or eventually capped, say at 80 IPCs?
Ever had the IJN have 4 BBs, 4 fully loaded CVs, 2 DDs, 5 TRNs, and 1 Sub -VS- 3 US BBs, 3 fully loaded CVs, 3 TRNs, 11 DDs and 1 Sub?

Commands: Galactic Empire Data Bank

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests