There is not any reason not to have a pc / iPhone / iPad version of this game.
There should be both. I'd rather not watch Il eat his chili while we game...

I would like the choice. This is 2010, not windows 95.
Who's being dramatic? The title of the article is "resistance to the digital age." That sets the tone.DrFager wrote:Spare me the dramatics. Nobody is arguing in favor of one or the other. They can certainly compliment each other and serve to attract new people into other areas.Tralis wrote:Staring at a monitor while moving a plastic sensor and punching keys can never hope to replace the experience of sitting face to face with friends over a table, sharing food, and moving little miniatures around. One is much more lonely and isolating. I much prefer to see my friends in person when I can. You sound very lonely, Dr. Fager.
I'm all for more options, including PC/Phone/Whatever versions of A&A. I parsed from his post more that he's questioning why physical games are the primary release path in the first place.elbowmaster wrote:I'm with Dr Fager on this one.
There is not any reason not to have a pc / iPhone / iPad version of this game.
There should be both. I'd rather not watch Il eat his chili while we game...![]()
I would like the choice. This is 2010, not windows 95.
Most people lose money gambling, so its a flawed premise that gamblers play to make money. That may be the goal, but its not the reality for the vast majority of players. Also, the popularity of online gaming proves the fact that people want action and convenience. Thats not an argument of superiority for either style of play, but more people each and every day play online than those that walk into a casino.Imperious leader wrote:No its a perfect example: People gamble to make money, but you are confusing making money with playing for fun. People who visit Vegas do it for the fun. If they wanted to gamble they would easily play online. Vegas would then go away and casinos would dry up.Online gambling has never been bigger, so thats not exactly the best example
People enjoy playing live. I play in Poker tournaments and even played at WSOP in 2003. I also play tournament Chess until about 2005. Anybody who is anybody in these can tell you its much more fun playing with other people than say sitting at the computer.
The thing is people do both and the live aspect is much more desired. IN the AA world this is more so because AA was designed to be played with teams in a social atmosphere. Thats the bottm line why they are successful as boardgames and not so much as online games.
So this 'resistance' is really nothing except a matter of economics. If the money was in it it would have already been done. Right now its free at gametable.com. This and a few other free sites are the only online platform that can support this game and sustain it.
I posted this on Sunday, so its possible Larry has not ignored the thread, but has been busy.Eagle wrote:I notice that Larry ignore this thread, but you can always discuss with me, drFag.
I agree. I hope there are moderators present on this site to address offensive posts, like me being called "dr Fag" by Eagle. Surely homophobic slurs are not tolerated here. I hope his post is deleted so that is does not ruin what was an honest attempt at a meaningful discourse with Larry.AxisGirl wrote:whoa. calling people names and being a jerk never proves your point. It just makes you look mean.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests