Search found 413 matches

by corriganbp
Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:25 pm
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Official Rules Clarifications
Replies: 1151
Views: 370576

Re: Official Rules Clarifications

If the allies attack a pro axis power but fail to take the territory, does the territory become axis friendly? (can axis units land aircraft on it on their next turn?)
by corriganbp
Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:28 pm
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Official Rules Clarifications
Replies: 1151
Views: 370576

Re: Official Rules Clarifications

Are kamikazi strikes only allowed against attacking ships? For example, if an allied power already has ships in a sea zone surrounding an island, and another allied power amphibioiusly assaults the island, can the Japanese player launch kamikazi attacks against the non attacking allied ships? In add...
by corriganbp
Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:57 am
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Alpha +3
Replies: 3197
Views: 945848

Re: Alpha +3

Bravo!
by corriganbp
Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:44 pm
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Sea Lion in Alpha 3
Replies: 727
Views: 212890

Re: Sea Lion in Alpha 3

The additional land units in UK and Scotland should fix things and probably would be sufficient even without the naval unit changes. The extra land units should get this back to alpha 2 levels plus a nudge. I like the mech, was going to build one anyway R1 but it's even better to start with one. (no...
by corriganbp
Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:35 am
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Sea Lion in Alpha 3
Replies: 727
Views: 212890

Re: Sea Lion in Alpha 3

Sea Lion update Oh I know everyone is just so sick of this topic. TheONE has stopped playing me. I'm not sure if he is still convinced that he can stop it. I think that a determined German player can get good odds to do it, and whether or not it is a winning strategy in the long run is debatable, wh...
by corriganbp
Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:40 am
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: Politcal rules, China, Japan, etc.
Replies: 40
Views: 16368

Re: Politcal rules, China, Japan, etc.

The allies weren't looking for extra wars to fight so I agree that it's unrealistic that the UK and ANZAC would have gone to war, but is this any more unrealistic than the fact that the Americans can attack Spain if they want a faster route into France? One problem is that due to the compressed time...
by corriganbp
Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:07 pm
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: The stop of sealion!!!!
Replies: 75
Views: 27554

Re: The stop of sealion!!!!

actually I could see 2 cruisers but the bb is gone. I'm not sure what you'd leave the ca in 91 when you could move it to 92, especially since the bb should be able to block the attack on gib. but again, with 2 subs purchased by uk, I'm not locked into a 10 transport stack, I've got other options. an...
by corriganbp
Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:02 pm
Forum: Axis & Allies: Global 1940
Topic: The stop of sealion!!!!
Replies: 75
Views: 27554

Re: The stop of sealion!!!!

If UK buys 2 subs on R1, why would the Germans even believe that they need 10 transports on R2? Sacrificing the 4 inf for 2 subs should give the germans the confidence to buy a destroyer at least.

Also, I don't believe that 2 cruisers will survive to defend england. the one in 91 is very sinkable.