Harris Game Design Forums

Barbarossa would be a boring game

I own Euro and Pacific 40 first edition so I'm not sure about this thing:

What's the american INCOME in the single EURO GAMES? Before and After War?

Mongols vs medieval china/russia/europe.

Or

Larry vs Hasbro/Wiz

Any war that has Europe as a battlefield is very interesting for a boardgame, due to the geographic area. I'll rate the pacific scenario second best. Games that have other battlefields (such as fortress america for example) are not as interesting, cause the flat borders make them a bit boring. I'd b...

I thought, based from ww2 to today, USA's favorite strategy is to bombard cities, stress the civilians so that they grow tired of the war and they dont support it anymore. I even read it in an american museum of war that the bomber changed the rules of war for the USA. https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akam...

I'm gonna try these tournament rules tomorrow when I'm helding a demostration of A&A 1914 in our local boardgame club.

I'm with Larry about the "keep it simple".
I'm just against 5 sea movements, just 'cause you can attack Constantinople from USA in 1 turn.

What about limiting naval attacks to normal movement, and letting all the navies move 5 only if it's an "NCM-like" move?

I'd be caution about letting your units strategic move through allies territories without restrictions. Some funny things can happen, like a full german assault on India round3.